Masaccio, Trinity with Donors, c1428 Santa Maria Novella, Florence
The Renaissance, meaning “rebirth” in French, was not entirely a rebirth of earlier classical traditions but a period of new ideas and shifting perspectives. It is sometimes described as the birth of individuality, with more focus on personal achievement and social mobility. This idea is often linked to the rise of the self-made man, though women remained second-class citizens with fewer rights and limited economic opportunities.
Changes in perspective may have been influenced by the plagues that swept through Europe from the mid-14th to the 16th century. With large portions of the population dying, labor shortages created economic opportunities for survivors. Skilled workers and merchants could gain wealth and status, which contributed to the rise of a new social class. This shift likely began earlier, in the 12th century, with the expansion of towns and the development of guilds. These organizations regulated trade and craftsmanship, giving skilled laborers a structured path to economic stability.
The growth of this new class changed how people saw themselves and their place in society. Individuals who had once been tied to rigid social structures now had more opportunities to advance. This idea of personal achievement influenced culture, art, and literature. Artists and writers began signing their works more frequently, and portraits became more common, emphasizing the importance of individual identity. These changes reflect a time when personal perspective became more valuable, shaping how people thought about themselves and their place in the world. The creation of linear perspective, since it literally referred to an individual’s point of view might have evolved from this.
Masaccio and Mantegna worked during the Italian Renaissance, a period when artists developed techniques like linear perspective to create realistic depth in paintings. Before this, artists relied on overlapping, diminishing sizes, and vertical perspective, where objects were stacked higher on the picture plane to suggest distance. Giotto experimented with intuitive perspective, making objects appear three-dimensional but without following a precise mathematical system.
Linear perspective was formally defined by Filippo Brunelleschi and later explained in writing by Leon Battista Alberti. It relies on orthogonal lines that meet at a vanishing point on the horizon line. One-point perspective has a single vanishing point, while two-point perspective uses two. Artists could map out objects in space by tracing these lines.
Masaccio, whose nickname Maso translates roughly to "Clumsy Tom," painted The Holy Trinity as a fresco on the wall of Santa Maria Novella in Florence. The painting is about 16 feet tall, possibly a little more, and is one of the first works to use linear perspective. Masaccio also applies different perspective techniques that had been explored earlier by Giotto.
One
of the most noticeable features is the classical architectural setting. The
scene is framed by a Roman triumphal arch, an element that may seem
unusual for a crucifixion scene. During the Renaissance, this would not
have been seen as strange, since triumphal arches were built in Ancient Rome
to celebrate military victories, such as the Arch of Titus or the Arch
of Constantine. In this fresco, Christ is positioned at the center of the
arch, with Corinthian capitals on the columns to the sides and Ionic
capitals above. The placement suggests a connection between Christ’s
sacrifice and triumph.
Above Christ, God the Father stands holding the cross, while the Holy Spirit appears as a dove between them. To the left, Mary gestures toward Christ, and John the Evangelist stands on the right. Jesus is depicted with an idealized, muscular body, resembling Greco-Romansculptures. This reflects the Renaissance idea that external beauty could represent spiritual perfection.
Outside the arch, two figures kneel in prayer. These are the donors, the individuals who likely funded the fresco. Their identities remain uncertain, but they are placed outside the sacred space, showing their humility. Below them, a skeleton rests in a tomb. The Latin inscription above it translates to: "What I am, you will become; what I was, you are." This phrase serves as a memento mori, a reminder of death and human mortality.
The fresco reflects Neoplatonic ideas that suggest a higher, ideal world beyond earthly life. The skeletal remains at the bottom represent physical death, while the divine figures above symbolize eternal salvation. This structure guides the viewer’s eye from the tomb upward toward God, emphasizing a spiritual journey.
Masaccio also plays with illusion in the composition. The dove of the Holy Spirit forms part of God’s collar, blending into the folds of his robe. The halos above Christ, Mary, and John are no longer flat disks but appear as elliptical shapes, giving them a more natural look. This change reflects a better understanding of perspective.
The ceiling inside the arch is decorated with coffers, similar to the architecture of the Pantheon. Masaccio carefully uses light and shadow, making the drapery on the figures appear realistic. The light source seems to come from the upper right, casting shadows across the figures and architecture.
Masaccio used linear perspective to organize the space. The fresco is designed to be seen from below, so the vanishing point aligns with the viewer’s eye level. If you follow the lines of the coffers in the ceiling, they lead to a single vanishing point at Christ’s feet. This perspective places the viewer beneath the donors, Mary, John, and Christ, reinforcing a hierarchy. The figures are arranged in a pyramidal shape, directing attention upward to God the Father.
The use of perspective and architectural framing makes the fresco appear as if it extends into real space. This technique places the viewer below the scene, both physically and emotionally, emphasizing the difference between human existence and divine presence. The triumphal arch around the figures reinforces the structure, linking the painting to Roman traditions.
The composition also has a social aspect. The donors are positioned above the viewer but below the sacred figures, showing their status while keeping them separate from divine beings. Above all, The Holy Trinity conveys a theological message through its structured perspective, using both classical and religious elements to reinforce ideas of mortality and salvation.
The inscription is important. At the bottom, a skeleton rests in a tomb with an inscription that translates to: "What you are, I once was; what I am, you will be." I sometimes wonder, if this is somehow related to the plague that even took Masaccio’s life.
Florence in the early 15th century was still deeply affected by the aftermath of the Black Death, which had devastated Europe in waves since the mid-14th century. The city experienced recurring outbreaks of plague, and the fear of sudden death shaped many aspects of daily life, including religious beliefs and artistic expression. The inclusion of a memento mori—the skeleton and inscription at the base of Masaccio’s The Holy Trinity—reflects this awareness of mortality.
The fresco was painted around 1427, a time when Florence had not fully recovered from the economic and social impact of the plague. Some scholars argue that the memento mori in the fresco was not just a standard religious symbol but a direct reflection of Florentine attitudes toward death and salvation in a city where disease remained a constant threat. Art historian M. Grillo (2020) discusses how Florentines structured their understanding of memory and faith in response to the Great Plague of 1348, which likely influenced the themes of Masaccio’s painting J. Snow-Smith (1988) notes that Masaccio’s memento mori serves as a reminder of death’s inevitability and may have been influenced by the personal losses many Florentines experienced, including Masaccio himself . Others, have linked the painting’s themes to vanitas traditions—artworks that emphasize the temporary nature of earthly life .
Masaccio died at the age of 26, and some sources suggest that he may have succumbed to the plague. However, there is no definitive record of his cause of death. The uncertainty surrounding his death has led some historians to speculate about whether his experiences during the recurring outbreaks of plague shaped his artistic choices.
The themes in The Holy Trinity connect to Shakespeare’s Hamlet, particularly the scene where Hamlet contemplates Yorick’s skull. Both the painting and the play deal with the fragility of human life and the idea that death equalizes all people, regardless of status. Hamlet’s reflection on Alexander the Great and Julius Caesar turning to dust mirrors the message of the memento mori in Masaccio’s fresco: earthly power and identity fade, but spiritual preparation is essential.
In my class discussions we do an analysis of how the idea of the memento mori relates to literature. In earlier lectures, we examined how Dante and Giotto’s writing and art shared symbols. Most likely these symbols and system of iconography was not invented by them but their works were the result of centuries of evolving stories and imagery. The same is probably true if you compare Masaccio’s use of the them of the memento mori to Shakespeare’s use of the same themes almost two hundred years later in his play Hamlet.
Come and study with me, videos, etexts, and study guides,
https://www.udemy.com/user/kenneymencher/
From Shakespeare's HAMLET Act 5, Scene 1
(In Grave Yard)
HAMLET
What man dost thou dig it for?
CLOWN
For no man, sir.
HAMLET
What woman, then?
CLOWN
For none, neither.
HAMLET
Who is to be buried in't?
CLOWN
One that was a woman, sir; but, rest her soul, she's dead.
HAMLET
How absolute the knave is! we must speak by the
card, or equivocation will undo us. By the Lord,
Horatio, these three years I have taken a note of
it; the age is grown so picked that the toe of the
peasant comes so near the heel of the courtier, he
gaffs his kibe. How long hast thou been a
grave-maker?
CLOWN
Of all the days i' the year, I came to't that day
that our last king Hamlet overcame Fortinbras.
HAMLET
How long is that since?
CLOWN
Cannot you tell that? every fool can tell that: it
was the very day that young Hamlet was born; he that
is mad, and sent into England.
HAMLET
Ay, marry, why was he sent into England?
CLOWN
Why, because he was mad: he shall recover his wits
there; or, if he do not, it's no great matter there.
HAMLET
Why?
CLOWN
'Twill, a not be seen in him there; there the men
are as mad as he.
HAMLET
How came he mad?
CLOWN
Very strangely, they say.
HAMLET
How strangely?
CLOWN
Faith, e'en with losing his wits.
HAMLET
Upon what ground?
CLOWN
Why, here in Denmark: I have been sexton here, man
and boy, thirty years.
HAMLET
How long will a man lie i' the earth ere he rot?
CLOWN
I' faith, if he be not rotten before he die--as we
have many pocky corses now-a-days, that will scarce
hold the laying in--he will last you some eight year
or nine year: a tanner will last you nine year.
HAMLET
Why he more than another?
CLOWN
Why, sir, his hide is so tanned with his trade, that
he will keep out water a great while; and your water
is a sore decayer of your whoreson dead body.
Here's a skull now; this skull has lain in the earth
three and twenty years.
HAMLET
Whose was it?
CLOWN
A whoreson mad fellow's it was: whose do you think it was?
HAMLET
Nay, I know not.
CLOWN
A pestilence on him for a mad rogue! a' poured a
flagon of Rhenish on my head once. This same skull,
sir, was Yorick's skull, the king's jester.
HAMLET
This?
CLOWN
E'en that.
HAMLET
Let me see.
Takes the skull
Alas, poor Yorick! I knew him, Horatio:a fellow
of infinite jest, of most excellent fancy: he hath
borne me on his back a thousand times; and now, how
abhorred in my imagination it is! my gorge rims at
it. Here hung those lips that I have kissed I know
not how oft. Where be your gibes now? your
gambols? your songs? your flashes of merriment,
that were wont to set the table on a roar? Not one
now, to mock your own grinning? quite chap-fallen?
Now get you to my lady's chamber, and tell her, let
her paint an inch thick, to this favour she must
come; make her laugh at that. Prithee, Horatio, tell
me one thing.
HORATIO
What's that, my lord?
HAMLET
Dost thou think Alexander looked o' this fashion i'
the earth?
HORATIO
E'en so.
HAMLET
And smelt so? pah!
Puts down the skull
HORATIO
E'en so, my lord.
HAMLET
To what base uses we may return, Horatio! Why may
not imagination trace the noble dust of Alexander,
till he find it stopping a bung-hole?
HORATIO
'Twere to consider too curiously, to consider so.
HAMLET
No, faith, not a jot; but to follow him thither with
modesty enough, and likelihood to lead it: as
thus: Alexander died, Alexander was buried,
Alexander returneth into dust; the dust is earth; of
earth we make loam; and why of that loam, whereto he
was converted, might they not stop a beer-barrel?
Imperious Caesar, dead and turn'd to clay,
Might stop a hole to keep the wind away:
O, that that earth, which kept the world in awe,
Should patch a wall to expel the winter flaw!
Masaccio’s The Holy Trinity and the graveyard scene in Shakespeare’s Hamlet share a focus on memento mori, a Latin phrase meaning “remember you must die.” Both works emphasize the inevitability of death and what comes after, whether through religious salvation or philosophical reflection.
In The Holy Trinity, a skeleton lies in a tomb beneath the main religious figures. The Latin inscription translates to: "What you are, I once was; what I am, you will be." This warns viewers that death is unavoidable. The placement of the skeleton at the bottom of the fresco, beneath Christ and God the Father, separates earthly life from divine eternity. The donors kneel outside the sacred space, further emphasizing this division.
In Hamlet, the gravedigger scene serves a similar function. When Hamlet picks up the skull of Yorick, the king’s jester, he reflects on how death reduces everyone—peasants, jesters, and kings—to dust. He imagines the great Alexander the Great and Julius Caesar decomposing and becoming nothing more than clay used to stop a hole in a wall. Like the inscription in Masaccio’s fresco, Hamlet acknowledges that no matter one’s status in life, the body eventually returns to the earth.
Both works contrast earthly life with what happens after death. In The Holy Trinity, faith in God offers salvation beyond the grave. The perspective guides the viewer's eye from the skeleton to Christ, showing a spiritual path from death to eternal life. In Hamlet, the focus is more skeptical. Hamlet questions what happens after death, not through religious imagery but through a decayed skull, a physical reminder of mortality.
Masaccio's use of linear perspective creates the illusion of depth. The vanishing point is located just below Christ's feet, aligning with the viewer’s eye level, so the figures appear above them. The arch and ceiling coffers follow the rules of perspective, similar to Roman architecture like the Pantheon. The fresco also uses chiaroscuro, meaning light and shadow, to enhance volume. The drapery on the figures shows highlights and deep shadows, making them appear three-dimensional. The composition is arranged in a pyramidal structure, leading the viewer's eye upward to God the Father.
Masaccio’s The Holy Trinity was painted around 1427 as a fresco in Santa Maria Novella in Florence. The fresco was commissioned by a wealthy Florentine family, likely for private devotion.
The patronage of Masaccio’s The Holy Trinity has been a subject of scholarly debate, but it is widely believed that the fresco was commissioned by a wealthy Florentine family, possibly the Berti or Lenzi families. Some sources suggest that the inscription on the tomb at the bottom of the fresco refers to the Lenzi family, which had connections to Santa Maria Novella, the church where the fresco was painted.
Art historian R.M. Comanducci (2003) explores the idea that the Berti family may have funded the fresco, noting that records suggest their involvement in religious commissions during this period. Other scholars, such as U. Schlegel (1963), propose that the work was part of a broader effort by Florentine elites to demonstrate piety through church patronage.
The presence of two kneeling figures in the fresco, identified as the donors, supports the idea that a private family financed the commission. Wealthy families often commissioned art for public spaces to enhance their social standing while reinforcing religious devotion. This was common practice in Florence, where civic and religious identity were closely linked.
The artwork remained in place but was later covered by renovations in the church. It was rediscovered in the 19th century, and restoration efforts removed later additions that had obscured it. The fresco remains in its original location today, though conservation work has been done to preserve its colors and structure.
Come and study with me, videos, etexts, and study guides,
https://www.udemy.com/user/kenneymencher/
