For all the videos in order with a textbook and study guides please visit:
http://art-and-art-history-academy.usefedora.com/
http://art-and-art-history-academy.usefedora.com/
Dada, Duchamp Style!
In 1913 Duchamp began to produce "ready-mades", mundane objects taken out of context by the artist, made unusable for their original purpose and presented as works of art. Talking about "ready-mades" Duchamp said,
¹avant-garde n [F, vanguard] (1910): an intelligentsia that develops new or experimental concepts esp. in the arts -- avant-gard.ism n -- avant-gard.ist n ²avant-garde adj (1925): of or relating to an avant-garde <~ writers>
Marcel Duchamp. Nude Descending Staircase #2. 1912 | Form: This oil painting is done in a cubist style but also borrows somewhat what from the moving fluid cubsim that one sees in the works of Italian Futuristssuch as Giaccomo Balla and Umberto Boccioni. The painting itself is kind of ugly and portrays the movement of a man descending some steps. The image is somewhat based on the time lapse photos taken by Eakins and Muybridge that record the same things. The use of ugly browns and the poorly copied style in which he borrows from Picasso and Braquetend to prove out what one of my professors once said, "Duchamp was a mediocre painter and because of this he became more of a conceptual artist."Iconography: The iconography of this image also borrows heavily from Muybridge, the cubists, and the futurists, but at the time, the time lapse image of human movement, recorded in a cubist vocabulary was seen as groundbreaking and avante garde. Perhaps, if one wanted to read heavily inot this image, it's possible to conclude that Duchamp's meaning is similar to the futurists and that the image is meant to portray not just a man but rather mankind's movement or humanity as it changes and flows. Context: When people first saw Duchamp's Nude Descending Staircase #2. at the New York Armory Show they were provoked, offended, and somewhat amused. The newspapers even ran a cartoon ridiculing the painting. (See left) According to the Brittanica, Marcel Duchamp |
Early yearsYears later, Duchamp is viewed as a sort of beacon or icon of the artistic avante garde. "Time Magazine" art critic wrote the following article about Duchamp that seems to indicate that Duchamp is a kind of hero of modern art.
Although Duchamp's father was a notary the family had an artistic tradition stemming from his grandfather, a shipping agent who practiced engraving seriously. Four of the six Duchamp children became artists. Gaston, born in 1875, was later known as Jacques Villon, and Raymond, born in 1876, called himself Duchamp-Villon. Marcel, the youngest of the boys, and his sister Suzanne, born in 1889, both kept the name Duchamp as artists.When Marcel arrived in Paris in October 1904, his two elder brothers were already in a position to help him. He had done some painting at home, and his "Portrait of Marcel Lefrançois" shows him already in possession of a style and of a technique. During the next few years, while drawing cartoons for comic magazines, Duchamp passed rapidly through the main contemporary trends in painting--Postimpressionism, the influence of Paul Cézanne, Fauvism, and finally Cubism. He was merely experimenting, seeing no virtue in making a habit of any one style. He was outside artistic tradition not only in shunning repetition but also in not attempting a prolific output or frequent exhibition of his work. In the Fauvist style Marcel painted some of his best early work three or four years after the Fauvist movement itself had died away. The "Portrait of the Artist's Father" is a notable example. Only in 1911 did he begin to paint in a manner that showed a trace of Cubism. He had then become a friend of the poet Guillaume Apollinaire, a strong supporter of Cubism and of everything avant-garde in the arts. Another of his close friends was Francis Picabia, himself a painter in the most orthodox style of Impressionism until 1909, when he felt the need of complete change. Duchamp shared with him the feeling that Cubism was too systematic, too static and "boring." They both passed directly from "semirealism" to a "nonobjective" expression of movement. There they met "Futurism" and "Abstractionism," which they had known before only by name.
The "Nude." To an exhibition in 1911 Duchamp sent a "Portrait" that was composed of a series of five almost monochromatic, superimposed silhouettes. In this juxtaposition of successive phases of the movement of a single body appears the idea for the "Nude Descending a Staircase, No. 2." The main difference between the two works is that in the earlier one the kangaroo-like silhouettes can be distinguished. In the "Nude," on the other hand, there is no nude at all but only a descending machine, a nonobjective and virtually cinematic effect that was entirely new in painting.
When the "Nude" was brought to the 28th Salon des Indépendants in February 1912, the committee, composed of friends of the Duchamp family, refused to hang the painting. These men were not reactionaries and were well accustomed to Cubism, yet they were unable to accept the novel vision. A year later at the Armory Show in New York City, the painting again was singled out from among hundreds that were equally shocking to the public. Whatever it was that made the work so scandalous in Paris, and in New York so tremendous a success, prompted Duchamp to stop painting at the age of 25. A widely held belief is that Duchamp introduced in his work a dimension of irony, almost a mockery of painting itself, that was more than anyone could bear and that undermined his own belief in painting. The title alone was a joke that was resented. Even the Cubists did their best to flatter the eye, but Duchamp's only motive seemed to be provocation.
Marcel Duchamp. Nude Descending Staircase #2. 1912 Thomas Eakins 1884 | Excerpts from, Days of antic weirdness. by Robert Hughes. Time, 01/27/97, Vol. 149 Issue 4, p70, 2p, 4c HTML Full Text Dadaism--its name made of baby-talk syllables, its intent to disorient bourgeois expectations of culture by any means possible--was a short-lived but fecund movement born and raised in Europe in the century's teens. It was more like a tiny religion than an art event, with a proselytizing spirit, a code of behavior, a core of the faithful, and a hope of transforming existence. It relied on irrationality, negation, sarcastic humor. Its most durable legacy lay in French Surrealism (the Surrealist fascination with the unconscious was largely inherited from Dada, and several artists, most notably Max Ernst, began as Dadas and drafted themselves into the Surrealist movement). Dada left its traces in America, but never struck deep roots there. It never acquired the criticality, the indignation or the longing for social subversion that marked it in Europe. It devolved into amusing in-jokes and tended to preciosity and quirkiness. This grew out of the tiny clique of self-professed illuminati that sustained it. Its sense of humor never grew as robust as the work of the professional funny guys who helped inspire it, like Rube Goldberg or the Marx Brothers. In America the Dadas were plagued by the thought that American popular culture was more Dada than Dada could be. And in fact they were right. |
"In 1913 I had the happy idea to fasten a bicycle wheel to a kitchen stool and watch it turn . . . In New York in 1915 I bought a hardware store shovel on which I wrote 'in advance of the broken arm.' It was around that time that the word 'readymade' came to mind to designate this form of manifestation. A point which I want very much to establish is that the choice of these 'readymades' was never dictated by esthetic delectation. This choice was based on a reaction of visual indifference with at the same time a total absence of good or bad taste. I realized very soon the danger of repeating indiscriminately this form of expression and decided to limit the production of 'readymades' to a small number yearly. I was aware at that time, for the spectator even more than for the artist, art is a habit-forming drug and I wanted to protect my 'readymades' against such contamination."
http://www.walkerart.org/resources/res_pc_duchamp.html
Marcel Duchamp.L.H.O.O.Q. 1919. Drawing on photographic reproduction. 7.75 x 4.125" (19.7 x 10.5 cm). | Robert A. Baron writes,The most well known act of degrading a famous work of art is probably Marcel Duchamp's L.H.O.O.Q., a cheap postcard-sized reproduction of the Mona Lisa upon which in 1919 the artist drew a mustache and a thin goatee beard. On one hand L.H.O.O.Q. must be understood as one of Duchamp's "readymade" works of art—works that he didn't make, but which . . . [force] the observer to see ordinary objects from new perspectives. In this way their innate aesthetic contents would make themselves manifest-as happens in one of his more infamous works: the urinal turned on its side and rebaptized "Fountain." However, to most observers, instead of elevating the ordinary, Marcel's Mona Lisa works in the opposite direction; it defaces (literally) that which has been cherished, and brings a famous work down to the level of vulgar vandalism and cheap reproduction. The title makes the point, too, but obscurely, since when pronounced in French "L.H.O.O.Q." reports as a pun on the phrase "Elle a chaud au cul," which translates colloquially as "She is hot in the ass." |
Marcel Duchamp. The Fountain. 1917 | Please go to this link to learn more about Duchamp's "Fountain." http://www.sfmoma.org/msoma/artworks/1466.html |
¹avant-garde n [F, vanguard] (1910): an intelligentsia that develops new or experimental concepts esp. in the arts -- avant-gard.ism n -- avant-gard.ist n ²avant-garde adj (1925): of or relating to an avant-garde <~ writers>
No comments:
Post a Comment