Gustave Courbet came from a wealthy family. His father was a landowner and wanted him to study law and become either a lawyer or a scholar. He sent Courbet to law school, but Courbet hated it. He told his father that he didn’t want to continue. His father agreed to support him anyway, saying that if Courbet failed, it would be on his own terms. So Courbet’s father paid for teachers and helped him move to Paris to become a painter.
By then, it was too late for Courbet to get into the École des Beaux-Arts, the main official art school in Paris. He started working on his own. His father paid for his studio and helped him show his work in galleries. This was unusual at the time, since Courbet was basically promoting himself with his family’s money.
If you would like access to the complete essay, quizzes, study guides and other videos, please visit my Udemy course.
One of Courbet’s most famous paintings has been lost. It was likely destroyed during World War II bombings. Only photographs of it remain, but it is well-documented. You can still see what it looked like through those prints. Courbet made other paintings in a similar style, and some of them are still around.
One thing about his paintings is the surface texture. He often used a method called impasto—a way of applying thick paint to the canvas. Courbet sometimes used a palette knife, like a flat butter knife, to spread the paint. This gave the painting a rough surface.
That roughness became a recognizable part of his work. It’s connected to the idea of showing the roughness of everyday life. Courbet’s painting style is similar to some social realist artists. The painting uses earth tones, like brown and dark yellow. Some of the colors are like those used by Diego Velázquez. The figures in the painting are arranged like actors on a stage, with a dark background that makes them stand out. It looks like a staged scene, with the foreground tilted slightly, almost like a platform.
Now let’s talk about what Courbet might be saying with this painting. Even though Courbet came from a rich background, he often painted poor laborers. The scene probably shows something he could have seen on his father’s land. In the painting, one person is clearly too young to be doing hard labor. He’s carrying a basket of rocks. Another figure is much older than you’d expect for that kind of work. They are breaking stones, probably for clearing farmland or making roads.
You can’t see their faces, which makes them feel anonymous. They represent the working poor—people who are often ignored. Courbet might be showing how hard their lives were.
This relates to something I noticed when judging a high school art show. Students from wealthy areas had taken photos of homeless people, trying to make them look dramatic or emotional. But it seemed like the students didn’t really understand the lives of the people they were photographing. Courbet may have been doing something similar. He came from wealth but painted scenes of poverty. That doesn’t mean his art isn’t meaningful—it just raises questions about how artists represent people with less power or privilege.
Courbet’s use of rough textures and muted colors supports the subject matter. This painting is called realist because it tries to show life as it really is.
A lot of what’s happening in Courbet’s work connects to the literature being written in the nineteenth century, especially when he was painting. For example, Victor Hugo’s Les Misérables includes scenes showing people from the lower class who are poor and mistreated. The main character, Jean Valjean, is chased by a policeman for years because he once stole a loaf of bread to feed a child.
Other writers during this time also focused on realism. Émile Zola and Gustave Flaubert are two of them. Flaubert, especially in his novel Madame Bovary and in a short story called A Simple Heart, tells stories in a direct, plain style. A Simple Heart is about a servant woman and how she sees the world. It’s around 30 to 40 pages long and easy to read. The story shows her life in a very straightforward way. Depending on how you look at it, she can seem like a kind, sympathetic person or like someone who doesn’t fully understand what’s happening around her. Some readers may feel sorry for her; others might not take her seriously.
Courbet’s paintings often have a similar feeling. One of his major works, A Burial at Ornans, shows poor people from the countryside attending a funeral. The painting is large—about 58 by 58 inches. In the center is a grave. The way the scene is arranged makes it look like a stage, with all the figures lined up like actors.
The crowd includes a variety of people. On the left, there are lawyers wearing red robes. There’s a priest present too. If you look closely, the people’s faces look rough and weathered. They don’t appear idealized or polished. A cross stands tall in the background.
Some teachers have pointed out that the cross could be a symbol of hope for these people—like the cross in Théodore Géricault’s Raft of the Medusa. In that painting, the mast looks like a cross. Here, too, the cross might represent how these people see faith as a way to find meaning. That connects with the character in A Simple Heart—someone whose simple belief gives them a sense of purpose.
Courbet may have felt sympathy for the lower class, but it’s possible he also questioned religion. He could be showing how religion works as a way to keep people calm and controlled, similar to the idea suggested by Karl Marx—that religion is used to manage and influence the working class.
At the same time, another viewpoint exists. A preacher from an inner-city church once said that religion isn’t the real opiate of the masses—drugs are. That perspective suggests that what truly distracts or numbs people is substance use, not faith.
This painting uses rough textures and local colors to show the difficult lives of these people. It’s meant to highlight their everyday experiences through the techniques and materials Courbet chose.
Something else was happening in the nineteenth century that Courbet was likely reacting to. A cartoon and painting on the right help show what he was pushing back against.
In earlier lectures, we talked about how the academic art tradition was established. It started before Jacques-Louis David, but the official academic style focused on classicism and orientalism. These styles often used historical or exotic themes, but many people believed they were just excuses to show off idealized nude figures. In some cases, these artworks were seen as tools for promoting political control.
In one cartoon by Honoré Daumier, this idea is made clear. It shows middle-class women walking through the Salon, which was the official yearly art show for accepted academic works. Above them are paintings of nude women, and the women in the cartoon throw up their hands and say something like, “Venuses again this year.” The joke is that even though the figures are clearly just naked women, they’re labeled as Venus, the Roman goddess of love, to make the artworks seem respectable. People could look at them because they were presented as “classical” art.
This shows that critics at the time were aware that the academic art world was not really focused on high ideals anymore. Instead, it was repeating old themes that some people thought were being used for inappropriate or shallow reasons.
There was also a larger conflict happening between the romantics and bohemians—who wanted change—and the official academic art world, which was supported by the government, including King Louis-Philippe. The academic school kept promoting classical traditions that had been in place for over a hundred years.
On the other side, the romantics were starting to shift toward realism, which we see in the work of Courbet. These artists and writers wanted to show real life and social problems. Some poets like Charles Baudelaire were also part of this movement, trying to push for change in society through their work.
This is the context behind some of the changes in art at the time.
If you would like access to the complete essay, quizzes, study guides and other videos, please visit my Udemy course.
